Persons and people are plural nouns for “person,” although “people” is the correct word for everyday English. For formal or legal writing, use “persons.”
- Alanna Madden
- January 20, 2021
- Grammar Tips
Persons and people are plural nouns for “person,” although “people” is the correct word for everyday English. For formal or legal writing, use “persons.”
If you’re talking about a group of people, should you use “persons” or “people”? Both terms are a plural form of person, but English speakers don’t always use them for the same circumstances:
To understand persons or people, you have to have a basic understanding of the word “person.” In general, the word person is a singular noun for any living human, body, character, or personality. For instance, a “nice person” is one pleasant individual. But if you’re describing more than one nice person, the correct term to use is “nice people.”
A large source of confusion between people and persons involves legalese (i.e., the language of law). For legal contexts, a person is any entity recognized by the government, whether it’s a human, partnership, organization, or corporation.
The noun persons is the plural form of person and defined within formal or legal writing as ‘an unspecified individual.’
Sentence examples:
Beings, citizens, characters, entities, fellowmen, humans, human beings, individuals, mortals, neighbors, organizations, residents, souls.
The word person or persons entered Middle English from Old French persone and Latin persona. According to Lexico, the initial definition of Latin persona was ‘actor’s mask’ or ‘character,’ but the noun eventually took the meaning of ‘human being.’
The word people is a plural noun that means ‘all human beings’ or ‘a group of human beings,’ especially when “the people” contrast to those who govern them (the elite).
Sentence examples:
The noun people (sometimes capitalized as “Peoples”) can also represent members of a specific community, region, or ethnic identity, where we can treat the noun as singular or plural. For example,
In a similar sense, English speakers may also use the phrase “my people” to represent anyone who descends from the same ancestor or anyone that supports the speaker in question. For example,
[1] Citizens, commoners, community, crowd, folks, herd, Homo sapiens, humanity, humankind, individuals, inhabitants, mob, mortals, nation, plebeians, populace, population, public, residents, society, souls, subjects, the human race, world.
[2] Blood, clan, family, folks, kin, kinfolk, lineage, race, tribe.
Unlike the noun persons, Middle English adopted “people” from Anglo-Norman French “poeple,” which comes from Latin Populus (or ‘populace’).
Another tricky aspect of people vs. persons involves the debate of collective nouns, which describe a group of things as singular entities. Band, class, crowd, and squad are all collective nouns that describe groups of people.
The word “people” certainly acts as a collective noun because it can reference many or all humans at once. However, most plural nouns have similar capacities, such as “puppies” or “crows.” The difference is that a group of puppies is a “litter,” and a group of crows is a “murder.” Whether you speak British or American English, a group of people is not “a people.”
English grammar defines “people” as a plural noun, regardless of context. Where many writers are confused is when we use “people” or “peoples” to reference members of a specific ethnic group, community, society, or nation. In this case, we can use singular “people” or plural “peoples.” For example,
Unless you’re a lawmaker or writing about law enforcement, we suggest avoiding “persons” to describe specific groups of people. In general, the word “persons” references groups of people in a non-identifiable manner. For example,
Early grammar rules once made the argument that we should use “persons” for countable nouns and “people” for uncountable nouns. Under this logic, we would use “persons” for any group of people with countable populations and “people” for an unknown ‘number of individuals.’ For example,
Garner’s Modern English Usage describes these outdated rules differently by explaining how “‘people’ is general,” while “‘persons’ is specific” and better suited for a small group (Garner 682).
The good news is that Modern English grammar has not enforced these rules since the mid 19th century, so there’s no need to fret between people vs. persons in casual circumstances. The only time you’ll need to use “persons” is for formal or legal contexts.
If you enjoy learning how culture and government affect English grammar, check out The Word Counter’s lessons on subjects like:
Test how well you understand the difference between persons vs. people with the following multiple-choice questions.
Answers